Hillary's Records & Rwing Spin..WP Fact check

Discussing all things political in NW Arkansas and beyond.
Post Reply
LaWood

Hillary's Records & Rwing Spin..WP Fact check

Post by LaWood »

Her Story
"Well actually, Tim, the Archives is moving as rapidly as the Archives moves. There's about 20 million pieces of paper there...I think that, you know, the Archives will continue to move as rapidly as its circumstances and processes demand."


--Hillary Clinton, Democratic debate, October 30, 2007, in response to a question from Tim Russert on delays in the release of Clinton presidential papers.
Rwing Story
"Library Lockdown Continues. Clintons 'Tightly Control' Release Of Hillary's Records; Inaccurately Blame White House For Backlog"

--Republican National Committee Press Release, October 22, 2007
Facts:

Both sides are being disingenuous, and are omitting inconvenient facts. Because of cumbersome declassification procedures introduced by President Bush, there are now huge delays in processing Freedom of Information requests at all presidential libraries, including the Clinton and Bush I libraries. But the Clintons are themselves taking advantage of a clause in a November 2001 Bush presidential order that permits former presidents to take all the time they need to review FOIA requests.

According to National Archives officials, 26,000 pages of Clinton presidential records are being held for release to researchers after being submitted to Clinton lawyer Bruce Lindsey for review. The records have been screened and processed by Archives officials under the Freedom of Information Act, but cannot be released to the public until Lindsey signs off on them as President Clinton's designated representative.

Whole story (it's good)
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/fact-che ... s-col-blog
Barbara Fitzpatrick
Posts: 2232
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 10:55 am
Designate the number of cents in half a dollar: 0

Post by Barbara Fitzpatrick »

I don't know about that. Yes, the Clintons could send a whole stack of papers they and their lawyer haven't read to the White House for final release by this president - but I sure wouldn't. I'd want to make doubly sure that what they released was what I sent. If it weren't for that "final White House approval" I'd agree that Hillary was being disingenuous about the time required for paper shuffling under W's new rules. Anything straight from the Library staff should (maybe) be trustworthy, but that's not the way it goes or has gone since W got his grimy mitts on the presidential proclamation power.
Barbara Fitzpatrick
Post Reply