Darrel wrote:DARDoug wrote: DOUG
As one fellow said, "Every stink that fights the ventilator thinks it's Don Quixote."
As another fellow said:
"Religions are like farts. Yours is good, but everyone else's stinks."
Atheism is a turd in the pool!

Darrel wrote:DARDoug wrote: DOUG
As one fellow said, "Every stink that fights the ventilator thinks it's Don Quixote."
As another fellow said:
"Religions are like farts. Yours is good, but everyone else's stinks."
Demonstrably false, or at least oversimplified. If beauty truly were entirely in the eye of the beholder, the research into understanding beauty would keep coming up empty. Instead, we have knowledge of the golden ratio and symmetry.graybear13 wrote:Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
No, you certainly don't need our permission. Clearly, you don't even need good evidence of it in order to state it, as you've just demonstrated. But that doesn't make it true.graybear13 wrote:I don't need your permission to state as a matter of truth that God does exist.
But I'm a non-theist who believes that love and beauty exist. Thus, "in my view," your view is absurd.graybear13 wrote:So anti-God = anti-love and beauty, in my view. That my friend is uglyness personified.
Ancient PRATT. How could we hate something that we don't think exists? Can you look up "atheism" while you have your dictionary handy? Can you be the first person ever to justify this accusation?graybear13 wrote:... and stop being cowards using freethinking as a way to justify and hide your hatred of religion and God.
Then you can show him to me, apparent to my own eyes? Go ahead.graybear13 wrote:The universal Father is not invisible...
So God doesn't want us to find him because of who we are? So much for loving us unconditionally and wanting to save our souls.graybear13 wrote:... because he is hiding himself away from the lowly creatures of materialistic handicaps and limited spiritual endowments.
graybear13 wrote:... because he is hiding himself away from the lowly creatures of materialistic handicaps and limited spiritual endowments.
And, apparently God does not want heaven populated by curious, conscientious, intelligent people. From what we've seen and heard from Graybear, God wants to stock heaven with gullible, stupid folk.Savonarola wrote:So God doesn't want us to find him because of who we are? So much for loving us unconditionally and wanting to save our souls.
Then I'm awfully glad I'm not going there. It's bad enough here in the real world.Doug wrote:From what we've seen and heard from Graybear, God wants to stock heaven with gullible, stupid folk.
DARThe situation rather is: " You cannot see my face, for no mortal man can see me and live."
DARGRAY
and I don't need your permission to state as a matter of truth that God does exist.
DARGRAY
So anti-God = anti-love and beauty, in my view.
DARGRAYBEAR
...stop being cowards using freethinking as a way to justify and hide your hatred of religion and God.
DARIn this forum you are out of your element.
DARGRAYBEAR
The universal Father is not invisible because he is hiding himself away from the lowly creatures of materialistic handicaps and limited spiritual endowments.
DARGRAYBEAR
No material man could behold the spirit of God and preserve his mortal existence.
DARGRAYBEAR
The glory and the spiritual brilliance of the devine personality presence is impossible of approach by the lower groups of spirit beings...
DARGRAYBEAR
...see God with the eyes of the flesh in order to discern him by the faith-vision of the spiritualized mind.
DOUGDarrel wrote:Speaking of dark, did you notice that while you can't see God's face, you can see his holy bum:
"And I will take away mine hand, and thou shalt see my back
parts: but my face shall not be seen."
Exod. 33:17, 20, 22-23
No black hole jokes please!
When you take another cultures myth-stories, and literalize them, you get nonsense.
When it comes to matters of the heart I am in my element. IMHOgraybear13 wrote:
Take it all with a grain of salt and
find the truth inside yourself.
DARgraybear13 wrote: I am afraid all of your critical thinking has wounded your hearts and therefore crippling your souls.
Isn't it strange how brilliant, well-trained minds' critical thinking is a bad thing?graybear13 wrote:Obviously you all have brilliant well trained minds and I respect that but I am afraid all of your critical thinking has wounded your hearts and therefore crippling your souls.
I think that there's only a little bit of similarity here. Pretending that one will eventually stand in the presence of God is just about as stupid as willingly standing in front of a strong gamma ray burst.graybear13 wrote:I think that a man standing in the presense of God might be like a man standing in front of a gamma ray burst.
DARSavonarola wrote:Isn't it strange how brilliant, well-trained minds' critical thinking is a bad thing?
I do this as well:)...it is likely because it is the first suggestion on spell check. If your spelling is atrocious and you have auto correct on you end up using the wrong word spelled correctly quite often. And yes...the Episcopal church would certainly have you. They are like metho-catholics...not that they are on meth, but rather they have become quite methodist in their general liberalness. I love the catholic church BECAUSE of the ceremony....I just wish they would wake up and realize that criticizing the church is an act of a GOOD catholic, when you believe they are in the wrong...or when they say/do something incredibly stupid. And as for atheist catholics...I am relatively certain I know at least one atheist priest.Darrel wrote:DARGRAYBEAR
The glory and the spiritual brilliance of the devine personality presence is impossible of approach by the lower groups of spirit beings...
I notice you consistently can't spell the word "divine." Would it be too much to ask that these higher divine creations know how to spell this word that so thoroughly defines their existence? I think that would be appropriate.
DARkwlyon wrote: And as for atheist catholics...I am relatively certain I know at least one atheist priest.
D.I don't see why there can't be rabbi atheists. There are
Christian atheists. From the "News of the Weird" column:
"Just after a Church of England diocese fired the Rev. Anthony
Freeman of West Sussex in July because he had admitted in a
recent book that he does not believe in God, 65 of Freeman's
colleagues signed a letter protesting their superiors'
'intolerance.' "
I got curious about Mr. Freeman, so I did some more digging on
him. In the various news articles I found (which I won't post
but will be happy to send to anyone who is interested), I
discovered:
-there are at least 100 Church of England priests who do not
believe in a supernatural God.
-some of them are members of something called the "Sea of Faith"
network, which has 600 members including 30 active and 20 retired
Anglican priests and 30 nonconformist ministers. Their statement
of intent is "to explore and promote religious faith as a human
creation." This movement also includes some Catholics.
-Freeman wrote a book called "God in Us," in which he said that,
"there is nothing out there -- or if there is, we can have no
knowledge of it." He defines "God" as the sum of the finest
human values, such as love, justice, joy and peace. Prayer is not
about talking to an invisible supernatural being. "It is about
stillness and recollection, and aligning one's will and one's
actions with one's highest values." In a BBC interview, he said,
"A substantial number share my views." He added: "A lot of
priests would like to be able to say things that they're a bit
afraid of -- and what's happened to me is not going to encourage
them."
-200 people, including 22 current priests [I'm not sure where
that 65 in the New of the Wierd article came from], wrote to the
Archbishop of Canterbury to protest Freeman's firing. They
expressed "deep regret that for the first time this century, a
Church of England parish priest has been removed from his living
for publishing views unacceptable to his bishop." The letter
says that Freeman had the group's support "in his efforts to
preserve a liberal and tolerant spirit in the Church of England."
One signer, Rev. Graham Shaw, rector in Kent, southern England,
said his congregation had trebled in seven years to more than 300
although he had published his disbelief in an objective God.
--Eileen McCarthy
Savonarola wrote:I think that there's only a little bit of similarity here. Pretending that one will eventually stand in the presence of God is just about as stupid as willingly standing in front of a strong gamma ray burst.
Oh, wait, I get it now: God causes cancer. That, or religion is a cancer...
To much of a good thing can be bad.Savonarola wrote:Isn't it strange how brilliant, well-trained minds' critical thinking is a bad thing?
No, I have neither want for nor fear of standing before God because there is no God.graybear13 wrote:You don't want to stand before God until you are ready...
I'm proud not to have "divine values" of stoning unbelievers and taking virgin females as war booty.graybear13 wrote:"Better that science be divoted to the destruction of superstition rather than attempting the overthrow of religious faith--human belief in spiritual realities and devine values."
But you'll never have that problem, will you?graybear13 wrote:To much of a good thing can be bad.
DOUGgraybear13 wrote:You still don't get it. You don't want to stand before God until you are ready because if you do then you will be toast, not cancerous , not slow motion death, but instant toast.
DARgraybear13 wrote: You don't want to stand before God until you are ready because if you do then you will be toast, not cancerous , not slow motion death, but instant toast.
DOUGDarrel wrote:If you think that's bad, try standing before a 9,000 foot fire breathing dragon before you're ready. Instant toast! Or a Klingon starship with all of it's phasers aimed at your head. Instant toast! Or if you're in the sea, a 300 million pound pissed off octopus with fricken lazer beams attached to it's arms. Instant toast! Or a boogie man with 29 heads, 895 horns, 666 pitch forks, 724 vibrating butt plugs and FIVE nuclear bombs. Instant toast!
Do you get the idea? I hope you get the idea.